|
|
|
|
| |
|
Woye
@woye1
·
6h
FEDERAL HIGH COURT DID NOT ORDER THE RECALL of
@NatashaAkpoti
1: I just got a copy of the CTC judgment of Justice Nyako. B.F.M as per
@NatashaAkpoti
vs
@NigeriaSenate
2: Summary:
-(a): That having found
@NatashaAkpoti
acted in breach of this court’s subsisting order, she should pay a FINE of N5m to the FG and to publish apology to the court in two National Dailies and on her Facebook page within 7 days to purge herself of the Contempt.
- (b): that Senate rules is superior to the Legislative House (powers and Privileges) act by virtue of Section 20.
-(c): that the Senate has the power to review the provisions of the Senate rules.
-(d): That the Senate President can allocate and re-allocate seats WITHOUT CONDITIONS.
-(e): that to suspend a senator for a period of 6 months equals to the suspension for 180 legislative days. That is excessive and over reach.
3: KEY POINT:
-(a): no 12: THAT THE SENATE HAS THE POWER TO And I BELIEVE SHOULD RECALL THE PLAINTIFF
@NatashaAkpoti
AND ALLOW HER TO RESUME REPRESENTING THE PEOPLE WHO SENT HER THERE TO REPRESENT THEM.
4: Justice Nyako never said “I ORDERED her to resume her legislative duties”
-(a): she gave an advice that “the Senate has the power to recall her back” so, it is left for the Senate in their wisdom to RECALL HER BACK or NOT”
5: You will recall that the court was clear in the case of Senator Ndume vs Senator Saraki whereas the COURT PRONOUNCED that the suspension of Ali Ndume was illegal and ordered to be paid all his outstanding salaries and allowances.
- the court set aside the suspension and ORDERED that Ndume be allowed to resume. Key word “ORDERED”
6: In
@NatashaAkpoti
the court did not order her to resume. The court left that discretion to THE
@NigeriaSenate
@Senator_Akpabio
7: it is time for diplomacy and not gra gra ooo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
